The Daily Mail inadvertently promotes green energy, sort of
- 11 Jan 2012, 16:00
- Ros Donald
What do you do when your anti-green energy agenda conflicts with
news that green energy customers are much more satisfied than
customers of the 'Big six' energy firms? You do some 'tightly
focused' reporting, of course.
Today's Daily Mail's front page, headlined 'The great energy
bills protest', splashed with
the news that customer complaints about the 'big six' hit four
million last year.
One obvious conclusion from the survey, conducted by consumer
group Which?, is that green energy companies are topping the league
table in terms of consumer satisfaction, making conventional energy
providers look distinctly ordinary. But perhaps unsurprisingly,
given their crusade against all things green energy, the Mail
manages to avoid drawing attention to this in its article.
The
survey of 8,000 energy consumers shows that small green energy
companies top the customer satisfaction league table, with three of
the top four ratings going to companies with a commitment to
expanding the use of renewable energy sources such as the dreaded
wind turbine.
|
Supplier
|
Consumer approval
|
|
Good Energy
|
84%
|
|
Utility Warehouse
|
78%
|
|
Ecotricity
|
77%
|
|
Ovo Energy
|
76%
|
|
Ebico
|
73%
|
|
Marks & Spencer Energy
|
57%
|
|
Sainsbury's Energy
|
54%
|
|
SSE
|
51%
|
|
British Gas
|
47%
|
|
E.ON
|
47%
|
|
First Utility
|
46%
|
|
Scottish Power
|
44%
|
|
EDF Energy
|
43%
|
|
npower
|
41
|
Source: Which?
Good Energy, which gets
100 per cent of its electricity from renewables, scores
highest: 84 per cent of its customers say they're satisfied with
the company's performance and would recommend it to others. In
comparison, the UK's 'big six' energy providers perform pretty
dismally. Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE) has the highest score
of that group, with a 51 per cent approval rating, while RWE's
npower received the worst reviews, scoring 41 per cent.
The scores appear to indicate that cheap bills aren't the only
thing that attract consumers to energy companies. As Which? points
out:
"Although Good Energy tops our table, it won't give you the
cheapest bills - it's about 25% more than the cheapest tariff on
the market, but that's only 7% more than British Gas's standard
tariff. One customer said: 'not the cheapest, but I wouldn't expect
it to be given their investment in renewables'."
The score is calculated based on four criteria - customer
service, value for money, bill accuracy and clarity and the
supplier's efforts to help customers to save energy.
Bill accuracy emerges as a major issue for energy consumers - of
the four million customer complaints about big six failures last
year, the majority concerned charging errors and inaccurate meter
readings by the UK's biggest energy companies. These mean that
customers paying too little are then hit with a large bill at the
end of the year, or that they are routinely overcharged on monthly
direct debits.
It's likely that customer satisfaction may be boosted for small
energy companies who don't have to deal with the same volume of
bills. It's also likely that consumers who choose to buy from the
green suppliers may be doing so because they have a particular
interest in renewable energy. The challenge for the small green
suppliers will be to maintain this performance if they begin to
attract customers outside the bearded, sandal wearing, Fairtrade coffee-drinking
contingent.
But the scores show their customers are satisfied with them for
reasons other than their green credentials - they are also winning
because
their bills are predictable and they help consumers to save money
by using energy more efficiently, according to Which?. Both of
these factors help consumers save money and bode well for green
energy companies' market competitiveness. But don't tell the Mail
we told you.