X

Analysis: UK carbon emissions fell 6% in 2016 after record drop in coal use

'disused welsh coal mining tower, wheels at top drive lift for deep underground mining.trucks and mining'

Carbon Brief analysis shows the UK’s CO2 emissions fell by 5.8% in 2016, after a record 52% drop in coal use.

The reduction would leave UK CO2 emissions some 36% below 1990 levels. The huge fall in CO2 from coal use in 2016 was partially offset by increased emissions from oil (up 1.6%) and gas (up 12.5%).

These findings are based on Carbon Brief analysis of Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) energy use figures. This analysis has proven to be accurate in previous years (see below). The department will publish its own CO2 estimates on 30 March.

Update 6/3: Carbon Brief’s analysis has been reported by the Financial Times, the Press Association and Business Green.

Coal crushed

The most dramatic change in 2016 came from coal emissions, which fell by 50% compared to a year earlier to around 37 million tonnes of CO2 (MtCO2). A decade earlier, in 2006, UK coal emissions stood at 137MtCO2. These CO2 cuts are down to falling demand for coal.

Coal use had already reached record lows in 2014 and then again in 2015. Last year set another record low, with demand halving to 18 million tonnes (Mt). The 52% drop was the largest recorded in percentage terms. It outstrips even years with miners’ strikes (1921,1926 and 1984), when coal use fell by around 30% before rebounding a year later.

UK coal use 1858-2016, millions of tonnes (black area) and the level in 2016 (orange line). Hover over the chart for more information, including year-on-year changes. Source: BEIS and Carbon Brief analysis. Chart by Carbon Brief using Highcharts.

Coal use has fallen 74% since 2006 and is now 12 times below the record 221Mt used in 1956. UK coal demand has fallen precipitously because of cheaper gas, the expansion of renewables, falling demand for energy and the closure of Redcar steelworks in late 2015.

Perhaps the most consequential factor, however, is the UK’s top-up carbon tax, which doubled in 2015 to £18 per tonne of CO2. The future of the carbon price floor is uncertain; it has only be fixed out to 2021.

On Wednesday, chancellor Philip Hammond’s budget is expected to set out the future path of the tax, which will have wide-ranging reverberations on planned coal phase out, the cost of low-carbon power subsidies and beyond. The steel industry has long lobbied against the tax, despite being shielded from 85% of its cost.

Last year, three coal-fired power stations closed in the UK and shifting wholesale energy prices pushed coal to gas across Europe, a shift that amplified the impact of the carbon price floor. As a result, UK windfarms generated more power than coal in 2016, even though wind output declined slightly compared to the very windy year in 2015.

Gas glut

While CO2 emissions from coal collapsed, CO2 from gas increase by 12.5% in 2016, as electric utilities switched from burning coal. It’s worth noting that despite this increase, gas use remains well below the highs seen in the 2000s.

Gas use for home and business heating has been falling for a decade, as more buildings are insulated and more efficient boilers get installed. Since heat demand rises and falls with the weather, this falling trend has come with ups and downs.

Note that while building energy efficiency has increased compared to a decade ago, the rate of progress has ground to a halt. This week, the UK Green Building Council said 1.4 homes would need insulating every minute, between now and 2050, if carbon targets are to be met.

Source: Carbon Brief analysis of Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy energy, emissions and coal use data.

CO2 emissions from oil also rose in 2016, though by only 1.6%. This was the second year running with a slight rise in oil use and emissions. Low oil prices and economic growth mean more miles are being driven in the UK.

Since 2010, drivers have benefitted from an effective tax cut worth £4.5bn a year. The government has not raised fuel duty in line with inflation and has cancelled a string of planned increases. At the budget, on 8 March, chancellor Philip Hammond will decide whether to postpone duty rises again.

Emissions down

UK emissions fell by 5.8%, Carbon Brief analysis shows. This is a relatively significant cut for a single year, though it was beaten by cuts of 8.7% in 2011 and 8.9% in 2014. All told, CO2 emissions in 2016 were around 36% below 1990 levels (see table, below).

Source: Carbon Brief analysis of Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy energy, emissions and coal use data.

The third carbon budget for 2018-2022 calls for a 35% reduction in UK greenhouse gas emissions, compared to 1990 levels. But the accounting method used for compliance purposes is complicated, making it hard to gauge whether the UK has already met its 2020 goal. UK greenhouse gas emissions were already 38% below 1990 levels in 2015.

UK carbon budgets cover a basket of six greenhouse gas emissions, not just CO2. Carbon Brief estimates that UK greenhouse gas emissions in 2016 were 42% below 1990 levels. Note that this estimate is much more uncertain than the CO2-only figures.

An amendment passed by the House of Lords last year would have changed UK carbon accounting so that these actual emissions were used for compliance with the Climate Change Act. However, the amendment was rejected and removed by the House of Commons.

This debate is taking on renewed significance, given the possibility that the UK could withdraw from the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) when it leaves the European Union. This would probably necessitate a rethink on UK carbon accounting, among a long list of issues it would raise.

CO2 emissions in 2016 were around 381MtCO2, Carbon Brief analysis suggests. Outside the 1920s general strikes, this would be the lowest level since 1894, when the Manchester ship canal opened, Nicholas II became Tsar of Russia and Karl Benz patented his gasoline-powered car.

UK CO2 emissions 1850-2016, millions of tonnes (blue area) and the level in 2016 (black line). Source: BEIS and the World Resources Institute CAIT data explorer. Chart by Carbon Brief using Highcarts. The CAIT data has been adjusted because it excludes land-use emissions.

Oil-related CO2 emissions have fallen from 197Mt in 1990 to 147Mt in 2016. This is because of a reduction in oil use for electricity generation, heating and for the chemical industry. Road transport emissions are almost the same today, as they were in 1990.

Carbon Brief calculations

Carbon Brief’s estimates of UK CO2 emissions in 2016 are based on analysis of provisional UK energy use data published by BEIS. The same approach has accurately estimated year-to-year changes in emissions over the past six years (see table, below).

For instance, Carbon Brief estimated a 4.3% fall in UK CO2 emissions between 2014 and 2015. BEIS (then DECC) subsequently reported a 4.1% reduction. Similarly Carbon Brief estimated a 9.2% fall in UK CO2 emissions in 2014. DECC later reported an 9.7% reduction.

It’s worth noting that both the energy use and CO2 emissions data are subject to revision. While DECC provisionally reported a 9.7% CO2 cut for 2014, its final data showed an 8.9% reduction.

Source: Carbon Brief analysis of Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy energy, emissions and coal use data.

Categories: CoalEnergyIn FocusInfographicsUK emissions
Tags: Coalcoal powerUK emissions

View Comments

  • Less carbon for green plant growth! As the earth is self regulating & the many variables way beyond the understanding of mankind, no one knows the ideal carbon dioxide level in earth's atmosphere.

  • What about the increase in burning wood? Is this in the figures for emissions? (I expect it isn't)

  • "All told, CO2 emissions in 2016 were around 36% below 1990 levels"

    This has a sense of unreality: Shut a steelworks and the UK emissions go down because China is now making the steel we use and so that doesn't count.Actually, the UK’s real carbon footprint - measured on our consumption - isn't going down much at all.

    In DEFRA's UK's Carbon Footprint 1997 – 2013 (the latest one), there is Figure 1 Greenhouse gas emissions associated with UK consumption 1997 to 2013. This shows CO2e emissions, measured on a consumption basis, to be about 1130 million tonnes of CO2e in 1997 and 1040 million tonnes in 2013. (There was a peak of 1280 million tonnes in 2007 before the banking crisis.)

    That's a 8% cut in 16 years. .(Approximately 0.5% a year)

    In the same 16 years the UK's carbon emissions, measured on a production basis, fell from 552 million tonnes to 463 million tonnes - helped by steel closures and other production closures.

    That's a 16% cut in 16 years. (Approximately 1% a year)

    The "don't count our steel" production figures are no help to the world wide effort to contain climate change. Let's have some figures (consumption based ones) that answer the right questions.

    I doubt that consumption emissions are falling at a rate anything like 5.8% a year - but that's what we should be aiming at.

  • This may have a sense of unreality (fake news?) however it is actually untrue: -
    http://www.gci.org.uk/images/UNITED_KINGDOM_Global_UKCA.png

    This data comes from CDIAC (1750-2013) which shows that: -

    1. UK gross carbon emissions in 1894 were around 90 millions tonnes
    2. UK gross carbon emissions in 2013 were around 120 million tonnes
    3. For half this period UK per capita emissions were twice as high as the USA.

    In other words this is clutching at straws.

    The fact the coal content of those emissions changed a bit over time is of no consequence as far as climate change is concerned. Furthermore, as global sink-function decreases and the fraction that is retained in the atmosphere increases and the fraction that is returned from the atmosphere to 'the sinks' certainly doesn't go back down the coal mine or the oil well. It goes into forests which increasingly catch fire and the oceans which are increasingly carbon-acidic, both of which increase the temperature by decreasing the sink the function yet further.

    Shame on you.

    • Dear Aubrey,
      I am sorry that you feel so strongly about my article. I don't agree that it is "fake news", nor that it is "clutching at straws", and it's disappointing for you to conclude by saying "shame on you".
      On the details, which you question: I took historical emissions, for CO2 from fossil fuel and cement, from the <a href="http://cait.wri.org/historical/Country%20GHG%20Emissions?indicator[]=Total%20CO2%20Emissions%20Excluding%20Land-Use%20Change%20and%20Forestry&year[]=1894&country[]=United%20Kingdom&sortIdx=NaN&chartType=geo"CAIT data explorer, and if you follow that link you will see in 1894 it was 362MtCO2. I adjusted the CAIT figures upwards, to cover LULUCF, hence my 382MtCO2 for 1894. You go on to quote a figure for 2013, but emissions have fallen since then: in my chart above, 2013=463 and 2016=381, so there isn't necessarily an inconsistency here (it's possible the CAIT and CDIAC figures disagree? Though I though CAIT drew on CDIAC?).
      The references to per capita emissions and global sinks are not really relevant to my analysis…
      Best,
      Simon

      • Dear Simon

        So what is your purpose? For that matter what is CAIT's purpose?

        The objective of the UNFCCC is safe and stable PPMV CO2. The Paris Agreement specifies a global temperature average of doing that well below 2.0°C to 1.5°C. IPCC says that is zero carbon emissions globally within 18 years for 1.5° C or 28 years for 2.0°C.

        The UK reducing coal in favour of oil and gas is hardly serious contribution to that.
        http://www.gci.org.uk/images/GLOBAL_CARBON_BUDGET_GROSS_&_Per_Capita.png

        Unfortunately, changing sink-efficiency and the constraint of per capita/gross emissions are fundamentally relevant to that whether we like it or not.

  • The impression remains with me that reconciling this commentary on CO2 emissions with the constraints of the Paris Agreement (< 2.0° C to 1.5° C) is not a requirement this author or this site is prepared to address.

    When this requirement is addressed we get a pictue like this: - http://www.gci.org.uk/images/UK_Only_Stacked_&_UKCA.png

    Without this the exercise seems quite irrelevant.

  • "But Holmes, my patients are still suffering from breathing London's polluted air, lower carbon emissions notwithstanding" Watson complained.

    Holmes jabbed his finger out of the window of number 221b at the traffic moving slowly along Baker Street.

    "There's your culprit Watson. The internal combustion engine, millions of them in London alone!" Holmes proclaimed.

    "What's to be done, Holmes?" Watson asked. "We simply can't go on like this!"

    "Hydrogen fuel-cells for electric vehicles, to speed up refuelling and make range-anxiety a thing of the past", Holmes opined, thoughtfully.

    "For buses, commercial and heavy goods vehicles too, Holmes? Is it practical? Is it affordable?", a note of doubt entering Watson's voice. "Show me Holmes, I want to see it with my own eyes."

    "There's a demonstration fleet of 10 hydrogen buses in Aberdeen, Scotland, according to this web-site." Holmes said as he clicked his mouse, his curiosity aroused.
    http://aberdeeninvestlivevisit.co.uk/Invest/Aberdeens-Economy/City-Projects/H2-Aberdeen/Hydrogen-Bus/Hydrogen-Bus-Project.aspx

    Scottish Scientist
    Independent Scientific Adviser for Scotland
    https://scottishscientist.wordpress.com/

    * Double Tidal Lagoon Baseload Scheme
    * Off-Shore Electricity from Wind, Solar and Hydrogen Power
    * World’s biggest-ever pumped-storage hydro-scheme, for Scotland?
    * Modelling of wind and pumped-storage power
    * Scotland Electricity Generation – my plan for 2020