Social Channels


  • Type

  • Topic

  • Sort

Receive a Daily or Weekly summary of the most important articles direct to your inbox, just enter your email below. By entering your email address you agree for your data to be handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

Lonely van floats in flooding in Nether Poppleton, England, United Kingdom, on 27/12/2015.
Flooding in Nether Poppleton, England, United Kingdom, on 27/12/2015. Credit: TruckinTim.
9 September 2016 16:23

In-depth: Climate change confusion over government’s flooding review

Multiple Authors

Extreme weatherIn-depth: Climate change confusion over government’s flooding review

The government has unveiled its long-awaited review of the risk the UK faces from heavy rain and flooding.

Prompted by severe flooding during the wettest December on record last year, the National Flood Resilience Review was set up in January 2016 to examine the risk over the next decade, as well as how the UK could be better prepared.

The report’s headline conclusion was that some parts of the UK should be prepared for rainfall 20-30% more intense than even the record-breaking events of last year. The extent to which this recognises climate change’s role in extreme rainfall has caused much confusion, however.

Media confusion

Carried out as a joint endeavour by the Cabinet Office, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the Environment Agency (EA), the Met Office, and the government’s chief scientist, yesterday’s review follows a call for evidence issued in February.

With the delivery of the review’s findings already delayed by several months, yesterday’s report garnered a fair bit of media attention – but with slightly different treatments of what the review says about climate change.

The Guardian implied the government’s expectation of more extreme rainfall comes from taking climate change into account. It says:

“The government, which had been criticised for not taking full account of the impact of climate change in driving up flood risk, will now plan for 20-30% more extreme downpours than before.”
Total rainfall in mm for December from 1910-2015.

Total rainfall in mm for December from 1910-2015. Carbon Brief chart using Met Office data.

Similarly, Mary Creagh, chair of the Environmental Audit Committee, implied the 20-30% greater risk will materialise over time, though she doesn’t mention climate change explicitly.

She said:

“Flood hit communities will be dismayed by the new forecasts, which show that winter monthly rainfall could be 20-30% higher over the next ten years.”

Others interpreted the raised risk as Met Office scientists accounting for the possibility of bigger swings in natural variability. The BBC’s David Shukman reported:

“The Met Office concludes that even without the effects of climate change, storms like those last winter could bring even greater volumes of rainfall – nearly one-third more in some cases.”

Getting into the details of the report, it’s clear the warning of bouts of rain that are 20-30% heavier than we’ve seen recently isn’t a climate change prediction. Rather, it’s mainly down to what is possible right now from natural variability. (We’ll explain more about this below.)

But the lack of clarity is unfortunate, given the report’s stated intention to “reassure ourselves that we understand the scale of risk that the country is currently facing”. It’s also worth noting the review appointed a subgroup of the scientific advisory group, whose specific task was to “consider the challenge of communicating flood risk effectively.”

‘Black swans’

Taking a closer look at the report, the 20-30% uplift figure is based on new “scientifically valid and plausible” scenarios of extreme rainfall produced by the Met Office for the review.

In order to generate the new extreme rainfall scenarios, the Met Office used their new HadGEM3 climate model. This model has a “higher resolution than any used previously in climate prediction,” says the Met Office, which means it can represent weather patterns more realistically than its predecessors. Met Office scientists usually run the model for predicting how the UK’s weather could vary from the next season up to the next decade.

The scientists chopped the UK up into six regions and simulated a decade of rainfall patterns over and over again to create a “virtual” dataset of more than 11,000 months of rainfall data.

These simulations were based on the weather we’ve experienced between 1980 and 2014. But the model also allows the simulations to venture beyond the limits of just what weather we’ve had in the past, to include the sort of extremes we haven’t yet seen, but are still plausible – what Donald Rumsfeld might call “known unknowns”.

As the Met Office explains in a blog post accompanying yesterday’s review:

“This has allowed us to identify several hundred extreme monthly rainfall events that are greater than current existing rainfall records, but are regarded as plausible for the current climate – what might be termed ‘black swan’ events.”

These extreme events are called “black swans” because they deviate from what is generally expected and are difficult to predict. But having thousands of simulations allows the scientists to get a handle on how often they might occur.

The modelling results suggest that, for any particular year and region in the current climate, there’s a 10% chance of a rainfall event that breaks existing records for monthly rainfall. Prof Adam Scaife, head of long-range forecasting at the Met Office and part of the team working on the review, explains to Carbon Brief:

“It might only be 10%, but when you multiply up a few regions and a few years, you can see it’s pretty likely that we’re going to have another record somewhere in the UK in the next few years.”

The Met Office looked at a plausible “worst-case” scenario for extreme monthly rainfall, which they define as an event with a 1% chance of happening in a given year.

Their results show that a 1% event in winter would likely be 15-35% wetter than current records, and for summer would be 25-50% wetter. Based on these results, and other factors – such as evidence from observations and the uncertainty in climate models – the scientists decided that an overall 20-30% uplift should be applied to current rainfall records for assessing flood risk. On why the scientists decided against being more specific, Scaife tells Carbon Brief:

“It’s not worth being more precise given the uncertainty. So, that figure of 20-30% is in the right ballpark. We mustn’t be precise without accuracy.”

Because these uplifts are based on the climate we’re experiencing now, they “include the climate change that we’ve accrued so far,” says Scaife.

In other words, the expectation for bouts of rainfall 20-30% heavier than today takes into account the contribution from human-caused climate change to date, but predominantly reflects what we can reasonably expect to see within the bounds of natural variability.

Clear signals

As well as looking at the current risk posed to the UK by flooding, the scientists considered whether climate change would further raise the risk in the next 10 years. If so, they would need to shift their expectations for heavy rainfall even further upwards. The report says:

“We have also considered the potential for climate change over the review’s 10-year time horizon to contribute to record breaking rainfall, but have concluded that no further uplift needs adding. “

While some might want to use this to suggest this shows climate change is not a factor in heightened flood risk, this is explicitly not what the review is saying.

Over a short 10-year period, the deciding factor in how extreme we can expect the UK’s rainfall to be is natural variability, says Prof Myles Allen, professor of geosystem science at the University of Oxford and a member of the scientific advisory group for the review.

Allen tells Carbon Brief:

“The terms of reference were very clearly set as flood risk over the next 10 years, and on that timescale, climate change won’t have much of an impact…even though today’s risks may already have been increased by human influence on climate.”

Looking at periods longer than 10 years, however, the impact of climate change is clearly visible in how much rain can fall in a single day. On this point, the report says:

“[Daily records] show a clear signal of more heavy daily rain events in the most recent decade…Increases in rainfall intensity have been documented worldwide and are recognised as being one of the most detectable signals of climate change.”

A number of recent “event attribution” studies have demonstrated the role of climate change in bouts of heavy rain. An analysis of the UK’s record-breaking wet December in 2015 found climate change increased the odds of the exceptionally high rainfall by 50-75%. A separate study  found climate change boosted the odds of the UK’s 2013-14 wet winter by 40%.

It’s simple physics that warmer air holds more moisture. So, when conditions are right for it to rain, climate change means that it is likely to fall in heavier bursts. Scaife tells Carbon Brief:

“There are very strong reasons for extreme rainfall to increase with climate change due to the additional moisture [in the atmosphere].”

Here is Scaife speaking soon after December’s record-breaking weather about how the record rains were linked global climate patterns.

Analysing how much rain falls over a month or a whole season is more difficult, however, and it may be some time before the climate change signal becomes clear, the report notes.

Flooding also depends on more than just rainfall. While rising sea levels are known to be increasing coastal flood risk, for example, there is limited evidence for any climate change-related increase in the number or severity of storms hitting the UK, the report adds.

‘Major upgrade’

In terms of what the UK can expect from climate change in the coming decades, a new set of climate projections for the UK that are due in 2018 – known as UKCP18 – will provide more detailed information. Current projections are derived from the last iteration produced in 2009 (UKCP09).

According to the Met Office, UKCP18 will provide a “major upgrade” to the range of UK climate projection tools that will have “more focus on how natural variations combine with the long-term climate trend to produce future extreme weather”.

So, while the nuances might have got lost in translation, yesterday’s report highlights how natural variability will ultimately dictate whether we see repeats of the scenes from last winter. However, climate change is edging up the flood risk over the long term. Scaife tells Carbon Brief:

“We have good reason to think that the increase in extreme rainfall is exacerbated by climate change and will be further exacerbated into the future. I think we’re all agreed on that.”
Sharelines from this story
  • In-depth: Climate change confusion over government's flooding review

Expert analysis direct to your inbox.

Your data will be handled in accordance with our Privacy Policy.